spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
    Latest Accounting News

Telephone: 03 9727 1244
Facsimile: 03 9727 0244
Email: Email Us

Address: Suite 2, 96 Manchester Rd, Mooroolbark VIC 3138
spacer
Hot Issues
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
Year-end tax planning
Home Office & end of 2021 tax year
ATO extends STP finalisation due date
Super transfer balance cap increase from 1 July 2021
ATO extends Division 7A COVID-19 relief
Tax implications - more than one job
Tax mix to rely more heavily on income tax as the Treasurer ducks austerity
10% Super Guarantee from 1st July 2021
End of year financial strategies
Closely held payees: STP options for small employers
Videos to help understand accounting topics.
ATO Small Business Newsroom - May / June
New insolvency rules commence
ATO sheds light on crypto compliance focus
Post Federal budget reflections
Federal Budget 2021 - Overview
Building a more secure and resilient Australia
Federal Budget 2021 - Health
ATO signals crackdown on 4 ineligible work-from-home claims
Taxpayers urged to keep work-from-home records
Businesses feeling ‘adverse’ impacts of COVID-safe measures: ABS
New insolvency rules commence
ATO promises not to ‘destroy’ businesses as it resumes debt collection
5 strategies for successful ‘work from home’ policies
Small businesses: don’t forget your FBT concessions
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Employers cautioned over ‘hard and fast’ decline in turnover eligibility

 

Accountants assisting clients with the JobKeeper extension have been urged to pay close attention to the actual decline in turnover test, with the ATO unable to offer leeway for those who come just shy of the requirements.

 



       


With JobKeeper now requiring entities to satisfy the new actual decline in turnover test, rather than the projected decline in turnover test used earlier in the program, the ATO will be required to follow the strict letter of the law in ensuring the requisite percentage declines are satisfied.


“[In JobKeeper 1], the legislation didn’t require the actual turnover to decline, so we saw a lot of organisations make a projection in a very difficult environment... and a lot of those projections didn’t pan out and that’s fine,” said ATO assistant commissioner Sandra Farhat on a recent ChangeGPS webinar.


“But moving into the extension, that is the test; the test is an actual decline.


“There is really no discretion in relation to decline in turnover, so there is no ability for the ATO to say, ‘Well, you were close, just not close enough, but we’ll let you through’ — the 30 per cent is a hard and fast legislative requirement.


“It is a significant change from a projected decline in turnover to an actual decline in turnover.”


The approach is a shift from the “sympathetic and understanding” stance that the ATO committed to earlier in the year when queried on how it would police the projected decline in turnover estimates.


ATO second commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told a Senate inquiry in May that the ATO would not nitpick turnover estimates that fell just short of the requirements because the law had merely required entities to make a reasonable estimate.


“If it ultimately turns out that the estimate was overly pessimistic and a business only went down 29 per cent, instead of an estimated 35 per cent, that is OK; what the legislation requires is a reasonable estimate,” Mr Hirschhorn said earlier this year.


Clawing back JobKeeper payments


The ATO’s confirmation of its new position comes as it releases fresh guidance on how it will manage JobKeeper payments that were incorrectly paid out.


For payments that were made because of an honest mistake, the ATO will not seek to recover these payments.


The facts and circumstances of each case will be considered, including whether the mistake was made earlier in JobKeeper when there was less public guidance.


Entities that did not take reasonable steps to check their eligibility will not be considered as having made an honest mistake.


Where payments will need to be repaid, the Tax Office will write to the entity to inform it of the reasons for clawing back the payments, how much needs to be repaid, and how repayments can be made.


Objections will be considered, while payment plans will be made available to those who aren’t able to pay on time.


The ATO also notes that it will generally not impose administrative penalties for JobKeeper overpayments that were the result of a mistake.


However, administrative penalties will apply if there is evidence of deliberate actions to obtain JobKeeper payments that an entity would not have otherwise been entitled to.


 


 


Jotham Lian 
23 October 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au


 




15th-November-2020
 
sitemap | site by AcctWeb